CALL 24HR CRISIS LINE
604-872-8212

CALL 24HR 

CRISIS LINE

24 HR CRISIS LINE 604-872-8212

Press Release: The Charter Does Not Guarantee Men a Right to the Prostitution of Women

By Vancouver Rape Relief Collective
June 15, 2011

A pan-Canadian coalition of equality-seeking women’s groups will be appearing tomorrow June 16, 2011, before the Ontario Court of appeal, in the case between Terri Jean Bedford, Amy Lebovitch, Valerie Scott (Respondents in Appeal) and the Attorney General of Canada (Appellant in Appeal).

The Women’s Coalition for the Abolition of Prostitution will argue to the court to uphold the laws that forbid men from buying, selling and profiting from women bodies, and to strike down laws that criminalize women who are involved in the sex trade.

The Women’s Coalition rejects both the appellants’ position of maintaining the status quo and the respondents’ position of striking down all three provisions in their entirety.

Jeannette Corbiere Lavell, President of the Native Women’s Association of Canada: “Aboriginal women are overrepresented and victimized in the sex industry, which testifies to the link between racism and misogyny in prostitution. Decriminalizing the prostitution industry will only expand the illegal and legal trade of buying and selling women”

“The Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies joins other women’s groups and equality-seeking groups of women with lived experience in calling for the decriminalization of women who are prostituted, trafficked or otherwise exploited or objectified in and by the sex trade,” says Kim Pate, Executive Director of CAEFS.  “All women are entitled to basic human rights to freedom from want, including adequate standards of living (either through social assistance or a guaranteed livable income), and the provision of social services, health services and educational options.  CAEFS continues to denounce, as criminal, the actions of those who promote and profit from the trafficking and sexual exploitation of women and children.”

“To continue to criminalize those (mostly women and girls) prostituted is to further punish the disadvantaged, the coerced, the exploited, the violated” says Lee Lakeman for The Canadian Association of Sexual Assault Centers.   “But to refuse to continue to criminalize the johns, pimps and brothel owners is to legitimize exploitation and further entrench inequality”. Lakeman for CASAC insists that “Women’s rights compel government protection from all forms of sexist violence and sexual exploitation under both criminal and international human rights law.  Criminal law is not enough but essential.  Tolerance of sexist violence and sexual exploitation of individual women like all other hate crimes affects the dignity and quality of life of all girls and women”

Diane Matte, spokeswoman of the Concertation des luttes contre l’exploitation sexuelle (CLES), commented on their position: “We must return to the fundamental question, which is the legitimacy of the purchase of sexual services. The premise of the Nordic model, developed in Sweden, Norway and Iceland, is that to achieve sexual equality we must challenge the commercialization of women’s bodies and sexuality.”

The members of the Women’s Coalition for the Abolition of Prostitution:

CASAC – Canadian Association of Sexual Assault Centres
NWAC – Native Women’s Association of Canada

CAEFS – Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies
RQCALACS  Le Regroupement QuĂ©bĂ©cois des Centres d’Aide et de Lutte contre les Agressions Ă  Caractère Sexuel
la CLES – la Concertation des Luttes contre l’Exploitation Sexuelle
Vancouver Rape Relief & Women’s Shelter
AOcVF – Action Ontarienne contre la Violence faite aux Femmes

Media Contact: Hilla Kerner, 604-872-8212, hillak@rapereliefshelter.bc.ca 

Copy of Factum

Read Also

The Women’s Equality and Liberty Coalition, as an intervener in the case, made written and oral submissions on the case to the Supreme Court of Canada

The Women’s Equality and Liberty Coalition, who as an intervener made an oral submission on the case to the Supreme Court of Canada is disappointed by the judgment.

Together they argue an alternative both to the prostitution laws that criminalize the poorest and most disadvantaged women while rejecting the proposal to legitimate pimps, johns and bawdy house owners at the cost of women’s constitutional rights.

March 11, 2011

Subscribe to receive updates on new content

Latest news, upcoming events and blog posts